Stockholders want a return on their investment...usually. Some investors may have so much money it doesn't matter, but this is not the norm.
Consequently, fopros must demonstrate that they can make money...make decisions...meet market needs...and adjust for the times...on a timely basis.
Stockholders have partial ownership in the school and consequently have a measured 'say' in how things are or are not done. The more stocks one has, the bigger and louder the say.
Employees of fopros often have ownership in the school they work/teach at as well.
Does it make a difference in how a person acts when s/he thinks it will change how much return they will get back?
Absolutely.
Deans, presidents, registrars and so on all may have stock in the company.
Consequently they work differently = usually better and harder. The care factor is turned up.
Decisions are made by appointed heads/chairs/bosses. The balancing act is still there but not to the extent that exists in a non-profit.
What do you think?
go to 老毕看中国
.jpg)
Comment Preview