
I teach a class on research writing. Much time is spent on documentation, citing, referencing, avoiding plagiarism. After reading this, I wonder if I should talk about fabrication of data as well.
Osaka University fired a bozo professor for fabricating data in a thesis but failed to point out that two other papers by the prof published in 2002 also contained forged data.
A vice president of Osaka University said, "The former professor regrets what he did, so I thought it'd be harsh to disclose his further wrongdoing."
Two questions come to mind:![]()
1. How can it be determined that a researcher fabricated data unless the research is replicated?
2. If wrongdoing is discovered, how deep should the finders dig to show dirt on the liar?
If you like this post and don't want to miss out on others, be sure to subscribe to this blog!





.jpg)



Comment Preview