"Much of global warming theory is based on global warming computer models that ... have consistently failed to adequately predict changes in climate," says Myron Ebell editor of the Global Warming Policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian think tank.
Ebell maintains that public attitudes toward global warming are:
1. not based on conclusive research
2. assertions of global warming alarmists wanting to influence public policy.
Further scientists dispute:
1. human activities cause global warming
2. tropical diseases are increasing according to global warming.
Finally, the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is:
1. driven by political goals
2. slanted in their interpretations
3. misleading and inaccurate.
In future posts I plan to share bite sized morsels from Ebell's and other's findings.
Global warming threats are misleading.
That's a euphemism to say that we are being lied to about Global warming.
We are being lied to, and I hope to do my part here at TBOK to expose those lies.
Subscribe to the BizOfKnowledge to learn more about the lies we are being told by global warming alarmists.
Myron Ebell, The Environmental Source. Washington, DC: Competitive Enterprise Institute, 2004. Copyright © 2004 by Myron Ebell.
.jpg)
Comment Preview